Skip to content

Conversation

narekhovhannisyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan commented Sep 2, 2025

Motivation

The Mailtrap Node.js SDK needed to automatically detect when it's running within a Mailtrap MCP (Model Context Protocol) environment and use an appropriate User-Agent string. This improves environment detection, integration tracking, and provides better analytics for MCP-specific usage patterns.

Changes

  • Added dynamic User-Agent detection that automatically switches between mailtrap-nodejs and mailtrap-mcp based on runtime context
  • Implemented comprehensive MCP context detection using multiple methods: main module filename, working directory, call stack analysis, and MCP runtime detection
  • Added MCP_USER_AGENT configuration option to support MCP-specific User-Agent string
  • Created comprehensive unit test suite with 12 test cases covering all detection scenarios and edge cases
  • Updated MailtrapClient to use dynamic User-Agent selection instead of static configuration

How to test

  • Run npm test -- src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts to verify all 12 unit tests pass
  • Test in regular Node.js environment - should use mailtrap-nodejs User-Agent
  • Test in MCP environment with working directory containing "mailtrap-mcp" - should use mailtrap-mcp User-Agent
  • Test in MCP runtime context (Claude Desktop) - should detect and use MCP User-Agent
  • Verify User-Agent header in HTTP requests matches expected value for each environment
  • Test error handling when process.cwd() throws exceptions
  • Verify node_modules exclusion logic works correctly

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Client now exposes the Suppressions API.
    • Added an optional configuration to set a custom User-Agent header.
  • Improvements

    • Email payloads are encoded before sending to improve delivery reliability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Walkthrough

Introduces optional userAgent support in MailtrapClientConfig and updates MailtrapClient to set the User-Agent header accordingly. Adds and exposes Suppressions API via the client. Adjusts send flow to encode the payload prior to POST, with minor ordering around testInboxId validation unchanged functionally.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Client config and headers
src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts
Adds optional userAgent to constructor/config; sets User-Agent header from config or fallback constant; imports and exposes Suppressions API; encodes payload before sending; minor ordering tweaks around testInboxId validation.
Types update
src/types/mailtrap.ts
Extends MailtrapClientConfig with optional userAgent?: string.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant App as Application
  participant Client as MailtrapClient
  participant HTTP as Mailtrap API

  Note over App,Client: Initialization
  App->>Client: new MailtrapClient({ token, ... , userAgent? })
  Client->>Client: Set headers (User-Agent: userAgent || default)

  rect rgba(220,235,255,0.4)
  Note right of Client: Send flow
  App->>Client: send(mailPayload, options)
  Client->>Client: validate testInboxId (if required)
  Client->>Client: encode mailPayload
  Client->>HTTP: POST /... with encoded payload + headers
  HTTP-->>Client: Response
  Client-->>App: Result
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature request

Suggested reviewers

  • mklocek
  • VladimirTaytor
  • vittorius

Poem

A nibble of headers, a hop through send,
I twitch my whiskers at payloads I mend.
New User-Agent, politely I say,
Suppressions in tow, we bound on our way.
Thump-thump—requests fly, carrots of OK! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description follows the repository’s template by including Motivation, Changes, and How to test sections, but it omits the required “## Images and GIFs” section that should list before/after visuals or note why none are needed. Please add the “## Images and GIFs” section as outlined in the repository template. Provide before and after screenshots or GIFs illustrating the dynamic User-Agent behavior, or if no visuals are applicable, include a brief note explaining their absence. Ensuring this section is present will keep the description consistent with the required template and aid future readers.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “Dynamic user agent” succinctly captures the primary enhancement of adding runtime-based user-agent selection and aligns directly with the changes implementing dynamic User-Agent detection. It is concise, focused on the main feature, and provides clear context for reviewers scanning the PR history.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dynamic-user-agent

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan marked this pull request as draft September 2, 2025 12:53
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/config/index.ts (1)

21-21: Option: include package version in UA for better telemetry.

Consider appending the library version (e.g., "mailtrap-mcp/1.2.3 (...)"). Implement in get-agent.ts to keep config static.

src/lib/get-agent.ts (4)

23-30: Make cwd-based detection case-insensitive.

Paths can differ in case across platforms; normalize before matching.

Apply this diff:

 function isWorkingDirectoryMCP(): boolean {
   try {
     const cwd = process.cwd();
-    return cwd.includes("mailtrap-mcp") && !cwd.includes("node_modules");
+    const lower = cwd.toLowerCase();
+    return lower.includes("mailtrap-mcp") && !lower.includes("node_modules");
   } catch {
     return false;
   }
 }

36-44: Broaden self-exclusion and normalize case in stack-based detection.

Also exclude node_modules/mailtrap-nodejs to avoid false positives when this lib is on the stack.

Apply this diff:

 function isCallStackMCP(): boolean {
-  const { stack } = new Error();
-
-  return !!(
-    stack &&
-    stack.includes("mailtrap-mcp") &&
-    !stack.includes("node_modules/mailtrap")
-  );
+  const { stack } = new Error();
+  const lower = stack?.toLowerCase();
+  return !!(
+    lower &&
+    lower.includes("mailtrap-mcp") &&
+    !/node_modules\/mailtrap(-nodejs)?/.test(lower)
+  );
 }

59-61: Allow env override and ensure robust fallback.

Let users force UA selection and guard against unexpected undefineds.

Apply this diff:

-function getDynamicUserAgent(): string {
-  return isMailtrapMCPContext() ? MCP_USER_AGENT : USER_AGENT;
-}
+function getDynamicUserAgent(): string {
+  const override = process.env.MAILTRAP_UA?.toLowerCase();
+  if (override === "mcp") return MCP_USER_AGENT;
+  if (override === "default") return USER_AGENT;
+  const ua = isMailtrapMCPContext() ? MCP_USER_AGENT : USER_AGENT;
+  return ua || "mailtrap-nodejs";
+}

59-61: Optional: add version to UA string.

If resolveJsonModule is enabled, append package version for traceability (example implementation):

// at top-level (outside selected range):
// import { version } from "../../package.json";

// inside getDynamicUserAgent():
// const base = isMailtrapMCPContext() ? MCP_USER_AGENT : USER_AGENT;
// return `${base}/${version}`;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffeca33 and 9da5776.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/config/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/lib/get-agent.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/config/index.ts (1)

21-21: LGTM: adds MCP-specific User-Agent.

Field name and value look consistent with existing config keys.

src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (2)

9-9: LGTM: importing dynamic UA helper.


69-70: LGTM: apply dynamic User-Agent header.

Header is set once per client instance, which is appropriate.

src/lib/get-agent.ts (1)

1-63: CommonJS-only packaging detected; no ESM support found.
package.json “type” is absent (defaults to CJS), tsconfig module=commonjs, and no ESM exports fields—no changes needed.

Comment on lines 9 to 17
function isMainModuleMCP(): boolean {
const mainFile = require?.main?.filename;

return !!(
mainFile &&
mainFile.includes("mailtrap-mcp") &&
!mainFile.includes("node_modules")
);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix ESM ReferenceError risk from using require directly.

require?.main still throws in pure ESM because require is an unbound identifier. Guard with typeof require !== 'undefined' and fall back to process.argv[1].

Apply this diff:

 function isMainModuleMCP(): boolean {
-  const mainFile = require?.main?.filename;
-
-  return !!(
-    mainFile &&
-    mainFile.includes("mailtrap-mcp") &&
-    !mainFile.includes("node_modules")
-  );
+  const mainFile =
+    (typeof require !== "undefined" ? require.main?.filename : undefined) ??
+    process.argv?.[1];
+  if (!mainFile) return false;
+  const lower = mainFile.toLowerCase();
+  return lower.includes("mailtrap-mcp") && !lower.includes("node_modules");
 }
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/lib/get-agent.ts around lines 9 to 17, avoid referencing the unbound
require in pure ESM by first checking typeof require !== 'undefined' and using
require.main?.filename only when defined, otherwise fall back to
process.argv[1]; replace const mainFile = require?.main?.filename with a safe
resolution like: if typeof require !== 'undefined' and require.main use
require.main.filename else use process.argv[1], then keep the subsequent
includes checks the same to determine mailtrap-mcp presence and node_modules
exclusion.

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 13:29
@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan self-assigned this Sep 26, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts (12)

41-41: Use jest.spyOn instead of reassigning process.cwd

Reassigning globals is brittle and hard to restore. Spy on it instead.

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/path/to/mailtrap-mcp");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/path/to/mailtrap-mcp");

54-56: Use jest.spyOn for process.cwd here as well

Repeat the spy pattern.

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest
-  .fn()
-  .mockReturnValue("/path/to/node_modules/mailtrap-mcp");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue(
+  "/path/to/node_modules/mailtrap-mcp"
+);

68-70: Mock cwd error via spy, not reassignment

This keeps the original method intact.

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
-  throw new Error("Permission denied");
-});
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockImplementation(() => {
+  throw new Error("Permission denied");
+});

91-91: Same here: prefer a spy for process.cwd

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");

112-112: Prefer spy over direct assignment

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");

133-133: Prefer spy over direct assignment

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");

149-149: Prefer spy over direct assignment

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/path/to/regular-app");

162-165: Combine both mocks using spies and real Error

Also prefer returning a real Error with overridden stack to preserve instanceof and other semantics.

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
-  throw new Error("Permission denied");
-});
-global.Error = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
-  stack: undefined,
-})) as any;
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockImplementation(() => {
+  throw new Error("Permission denied");
+});
+global.Error = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
+  const e = new originalError("Test error");
+  Object.defineProperty(e, "stack", { value: undefined });
+  return e;
+}) as any;

Tip: apply the “real Error with overridden stack” pattern to other stack-based tests, too (Lines 82-89, 102-109, 124-131, 145-147).


181-183: Prefer spy over direct assignment

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest
-  .fn()
-  .mockReturnValue("/Users/user/projects/mailtrap-mcp");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue(
+  "/Users/user/projects/mailtrap-mcp"
+);

195-195: Prefer spy over direct assignment

Apply:

-process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue("/Users/user/projects/my-app");
+jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue("/Users/user/projects/my-app");

82-89: Return a real Error instance with a mocked stack

Returning a plain object breaks Error semantics. Use the original constructor and override stack.

Apply:

-global.Error = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
-  stack: `
-Error: Test error
-    at Object.<anonymous> (/path/to/mailtrap-mcp/index.js:10:1)
-    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
-        `,
-})) as any;
+global.Error = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
+  const e = new originalError("Test error");
+  Object.defineProperty(e, "stack", {
+    value: `
+Error: Test error
+    at Object.<anonymous> (/path/to/mailtrap-mcp/index.js:10:1)
+    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
+        `,
+  });
+  return e;
+}) as any;

206-256: Strengthen the integration test: assert getDynamicUserAgent is used

Right now it only checks client is created. Mock get-agent and assert it’s called during client construction. Also align the config mock to default-export shape.

Apply:

-      jest.doMock("../../config", () => ({
-        CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
+      jest.doMock("../../config", () => ({
+        __esModule: true,
+        default: {
+          CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
             SENDING_ENDPOINT: "https://send.api.mailtrap.io",
             BULK_ENDPOINT: "https://bulk.api.mailtrap.io",
             TESTING_ENDPOINT: "https://sandbox.api.mailtrap.io",
             GENERAL_ENDPOINT: "https://mailtrap.io",
             USER_AGENT:
               "mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
             MCP_USER_AGENT:
               "mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
             MAX_REDIRECTS: 0,
             TIMEOUT: 10000,
-        },
-        ERRORS: {
+          },
+          ERRORS: {
             FILENAME_REQUIRED: "Filename is required.",
             CONTENT_REQUIRED: "Content is required.",
             SUBJECT_REQUIRED: "Subject is required.",
             FROM_REQUIRED: "From is required.",
             SENDING_FAILED: "Sending failed.",
             NO_DATA_ERROR: "No Data.",
             TEST_INBOX_ID_MISSING:
               "testInboxId is missing, testing API will not work.",
             ACCOUNT_ID_MISSING:
               "accountId is missing, some features of testing API may not work properly.",
             BULK_SANDBOX_INCOMPATIBLE:
               "Bulk mode is not applicable for sandbox API.",
-        },
-        TRANSPORT_SETTINGS: {
-          NAME: "MailtrapTransport",
-        },
+          },
+          TRANSPORT_SETTINGS: {
+            NAME: "MailtrapTransport",
+          },
+        },
       }));
 
+      const getAgentMock = jest.fn(() => "ua-from-test");
+      jest.doMock("../../lib/get-agent", () => ({
+        __esModule: true,
+        default: getAgentMock,
+      }));
+
       // Clear module cache and re-import
       jest.resetModules();
       const { default: MailtrapClient } = jest.requireActual(
         "../../lib/MailtrapClient"
       );
@@
-      // The User-Agent should be set in the axios instance
-      // We can't easily test the internal axios instance, but we can verify
-      // that the function is called during client creation
-      expect(client).toBeDefined();
+      // Ensure dynamic UA is consulted during client creation
+      expect(client).toBeDefined();
+      expect(getAgentMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9da5776 and c403388.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/lib/get-agent.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/lib/get-agent.ts
  • src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts (1)

29-39: Good baseline coverage and scenarios

Nice coverage of defaults, cwd-based, call stack-based, and error edge cases.

Comment on lines 4 to 10
jest.mock("../../config", () => ({
CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
USER_AGENT:
"mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
MCP_USER_AGENT: "mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
},
}));
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Mock the default export shape of config to avoid interop breakage

The test imports CONFIG as a default export, but the mock returns a plain object. Under ts-jest/Babel interop, default may be undefined. Return { __esModule: true, default: ... }.

Apply this diff:

-jest.mock("../../config", () => ({
-  CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
-    USER_AGENT:
-      "mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
-    MCP_USER_AGENT: "mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
-  },
-}));
+jest.mock("../../config", () => ({
+  __esModule: true,
+  default: {
+    CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
+      USER_AGENT:
+        "mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
+      MCP_USER_AGENT:
+        "mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
+    },
+  },
+}));
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
jest.mock("../../config", () => ({
CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
USER_AGENT:
"mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
MCP_USER_AGENT: "mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
},
}));
jest.mock("../../config", () => ({
__esModule: true,
default: {
CLIENT_SETTINGS: {
USER_AGENT:
"mailtrap-nodejs (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-nodejs)",
MCP_USER_AGENT:
"mailtrap-mcp (https://github.com/railsware/mailtrap-mcp)",
},
},
}));
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts around lines 4 to 10, the jest.mock
currently returns a plain object which breaks default-import interop under
ts-jest/Babel; update the mock to export a proper ES module shape by returning
an object with __esModule: true and a default property containing the original
CLIENT_SETTINGS object so the imported CONFIG default is defined.

Comment on lines 13 to 27
let originalCwd: string;
let originalError: typeof Error;

beforeEach(() => {
// Store original values
originalCwd = process.cwd();
originalError = global.Error;
});

afterEach(() => {
// Restore original values
process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(originalCwd);
global.Error = originalError;
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Restore the real process.cwd; don’t replace it with a mock

You’re saving the cwd value (string) and then replacing process.cwd with a mock that returns that string. This leaks a mocked function into global state across the suite.

Apply this minimal fix (and prefer spy-based mocking in tests):

-  let originalCwd: string;
+  let originalCwdFn: typeof process.cwd;
   let originalError: typeof Error;

   beforeEach(() => {
     // Store original values
-    originalCwd = process.cwd();
+    originalCwdFn = process.cwd;
     originalError = global.Error;
   });

   afterEach(() => {
     // Restore original values
-    process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(originalCwd);
+    process.cwd = originalCwdFn;
     global.Error = originalError;
-    jest.clearAllMocks();
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
   });

Follow-up (recommended): replace all direct assignments to process.cwd in tests with jest.spyOn(process, "cwd").mockReturnValue(...).

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
let originalCwd: string;
let originalError: typeof Error;
beforeEach(() => {
// Store original values
originalCwd = process.cwd();
originalError = global.Error;
});
afterEach(() => {
// Restore original values
process.cwd = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(originalCwd);
global.Error = originalError;
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
let originalCwdFn: typeof process.cwd;
let originalError: typeof Error;
beforeEach(() => {
// Store original values
originalCwdFn = process.cwd;
originalError = global.Error;
});
afterEach(() => {
// Restore original values
process.cwd = originalCwdFn;
global.Error = originalError;
jest.restoreAllMocks();
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/__tests__/lib/get-agent.test.ts around lines 13-27, the test saves only
the cwd string and then replaces process.cwd with a mock that returns that
string, leaking a mocked function into global state; change the setup to save
the original process.cwd function (e.g., originalCwdFn = process.cwd) and in
afterEach restore the original function (process.cwd = originalCwdFn) instead of
assigning a jest.fn(), and, going forward, use jest.spyOn(process,
"cwd").mockReturnValue(...) when mocking cwd in tests so the spy can be restored
automatically.

* Gets the appropriate User-Agent string based on the current context.
* @returns The User-Agent string for the current context
*/
function getDynamicUserAgent(): string {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you ask me, bringing the MCP concern to the SDK project is a violation of the SRP 🙂 I would approach this differently and allow specifying the user agent directly via a configuration setting of the SDK client. And, override this setting in the MCP server NPM package.
It's simpler, and it's not a big deal to allow users of the SDK to override the user agent; it's fairly easy to do this anyway.
WDYT?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if allowing users to override user agent is not a problem, then its simple solution. I thought that we don't want to enable users to change the user agent.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yanchuk WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with @vittorius, it's cleaner to allow to override user agent, and it might be useful for other purposes (for the users), too.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c403388 and 84b609a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/types/mailtrap.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (1)
src/types/mailtrap.ts (1)
  • MailtrapClientConfig (64-71)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/lib/MailtrapClient.ts (5)

15-15: Suppressions API addition not mentioned in PR objectives.

The import of SuppressionsBaseAPI appears unrelated to the PR's stated purpose of adding dynamic User-Agent detection. This suggests either:

  1. The PR description is incomplete, or
  2. Unrelated changes were bundled into this PR

Consider splitting unrelated changes into separate PRs for clearer review and git history.


62-63: User-Agent parameter implementation looks correct.

The constructor correctly accepts the optional userAgent parameter matching the type definition.


70-70: Static User-Agent configuration instead of dynamic detection.

This implementation uses a static fallback pattern (userAgent || USER_AGENT) rather than the dynamic MCP context detection described in the PR objectives. The PR objectives mention:

  • MCP context detection using main module filename
  • Working directory analysis
  • Call stack analysis
  • MCP runtime detection

None of this detection logic is present here. The user must manually pass the correct userAgent value.

If the detection logic exists in a separate file (e.g., a get-agent.ts utility), it should be called here instead of the simple fallback. Something like:

"User-Agent": userAgent || getAgent() || USER_AGENT,

Where getAgent() would perform the MCP detection logic described in the PR objectives.


154-158: Suppressions API getter not related to PR objectives.

The addition of the suppressions getter provides access to the Suppressions API, but this is not mentioned in the PR objectives which focus solely on dynamic User-Agent detection.

Consider moving this to a separate PR focused on API additions for better change tracking and clearer git history.


191-192: Minor refactor: Extract encoded mail to variable.

Extracting encodeMailBuffers(mail) to a preparedMail variable improves readability without changing functionality.

@yanchuk yanchuk requested a review from VladimirTaytor October 1, 2025 20:42
@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan merged commit dc5cd84 into main Oct 2, 2025
4 checks passed
@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan deleted the dynamic-user-agent branch October 2, 2025 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants